At the beginning of each class, ideally to limber up our brains, I randomly ask the roundtable of students to verbally “tweet out” a thought about something they’ve seen or done or had a mental blip about since we last met. (I totally, totally stole this idea from American University writing prof/lecturer Glenn Moomau, whose nonfiction class I spoke to last spring.) What I’m trying to get them to do is blurt out something they’ve noticed. It can be pop culture or not. If you’re on Twitter a lot, you know how quickly your brain converted to the 140-character thought-scoop or laugh line. We give these away for free. That’s just how it is.

We had a productive discussion about the assigned readings: Monica Hesse on the Dorito man and the “@” symbol; Martha Sherrill on August; me on Jake Ryan. For you Beloit Mindsetters (a curse upon you), about half of the 17 students have never seen “Sixteen Candles.” (Most of them are seniors, born c. 1991; a few are older than that.)

Hi and everything.

For Carli Krueger, JOUR494′s resident ’80s freak (besides the professor), I presented the special gift of a printout of the sequel to the Jake Ryan story: The Lloyd Dobler story.

Anyhow, the point I’m trying to get through: Popular culture journalism may be regarded by more serious reporters as fluff and nonsense. Yet, done right, it can have a real resonance for readers — especially readers who enjoy writing that is smart and playful. (They exist!) As connected as we are, we still enjoy communing with one another over shared cultural touchstones. Thus, a teen-angst movie from 1984 can take on 1,000 times more emotional magnitude when allowed to properly age for 10 or 20 years. So can the Dorito chip. So can almost anything, if the writer works hard enough enough to pull it apart and finds the right sources to prove her point.

This led to a fun discussion: Who is the “Jake Ryan” for today’s young woman? Well, there is the whole Team Jacob/Team Edward thing. (Though this brought hoots of protest.) Harry Potter is almost too big — a category killer. (And for the guys? Their impossible crush? Scarlett Johannson, we were authoritatively informed. What about Megan Fox, a woman countered. And so on …)

We spent the rest of the class — and even a few minutes more — listening to everybody’s pitches for the reported essay (aka “The Thing Itself”). Some are well on their way with reporting and thinking about their subject. Eggos, Chaco’s, hair extensions, pre-distressed Fender guitars, Missoula and its many, many Subarus. Some are still trying to narrow down a broader topic — “status updates,” “smartphones” — into a sharper idea. That’s why the feedback from a roomful of other writers is so helpful. For those who had three or four ideas, we could shout out YESSSSSS to the best one. We also shared ideas for sources and the “don’t-forget-about” tangents that should be included in the essay. Deadline is Monday — 1,000-1,300 words. Remember to include your SEO keywords with the text. And don’t forget: THE DOCTOR IS IN. I’m here to help.

I feel like the class is gelling. I enjoy seeing them. I can’t wait to read their work.

For Wednesday, Sept. 12: We are moving on. The next few classes are about how to write CRITICISM/REVIEWS. To get that party started, we’re doing film first. Your assigned readings:

• Pauline Kael reviews “The Exorcist” (The New Yorker, Jan. 7, 1974)

• Anthony Lane reviews “Star Wars — Episode I: The Phantom Menace” (The New Yorker, May 24/31, 1999)

Wesley Morris, this year’s winner of the Pulitzer Prize for criticism, reviews “Drive” (The Boston Globe, Sept. 16, 2011) and “The Help” (The Boston Globe, Aug. 10, 2011)

• And something completely different: Lindy West on “Sex and the City 2” (The Stranger, May 25, 2010) and “The Eagle” (The Stranger, Feb. 9, 2011)

Photo: PBS

Moving forward with trying to figure out how to approach the reported essay. We discussed some good ones today, mentioning their weaknesses as well:

Didion on the Hoover Dam: An example of how to write about something that is beautiful and yet creeps you out. When something amazes and frightens you, you’re headed in the right direction. All the biggies are here — voice, tone, fact, vibe and most of all, a lasting impression. Not everyone loved it (not everyone ever did when it comes the woman — the “neurasthenic Cher” — who built her career on Santa Ana winds, chintz curtains and migraines), but oh, those words. Lunar clarity. As it was in the beginning, is now and ever shall be … Those sentences. I pulled out my overused observation about Joan: Nobody parallel parks a Winnebago-size sentence like her. How often do you see something really mindblowing (the Hoover Dam, or closer by, the Grand Tetons, or the Berkeley Pit) and talk about it generally, abstractly: “It was amazing” or “It blew my mind” or “It freaked me out.” Work harder to describe exactly what it is. Notice how closely she paid attention to the turbines and machinery she was shown on her tour.

Henry Allen on handcuffs: Henry emailed me last week after I told him we were reading this particular piece. “I just re-read it. What does it feel like to be handcuffed? What does it mean? I asked those two questions about everything.” As should we all. The potential for these essays is all around us. This one came about topically, because Washington was in a dither about a woman who’d been pulled over on Wisconsin Avenue and handcuffed to a mailbox. A picture ran in the paper and people were decrying the use of handcuffs. Which got Henry thinking about handcuffs in general — discipline, sex, fetish, control. I don’t just mean thinking, I also mean research. It’s all right there, leading up to the penultimate one-sentence paragraph, one of my all time favorite Henry Allen lines:

Keep it up and you’ll learn about leg irons.

Klosterman on breakfast cereal: Not a perfect piece, most of us agreed, but I gained some insight into how and why the youngs dig them some Chuck. I admire the synthesis of history in the opening paragraphs — all that bizarro Victorian-era quack science about nutrition and sex and bowels and corn flakes that ultimately gave us Trix and Cocoa Puffs. (Could it have used a smidgen of attribution to breakfast historians? Or does the second line — “As any breakfast historian will tell you” — cover him well enough?) And who can resist his observations about the strange morality/discrimination of cereal advertising, in which the rabbit can never have any Trix, Barney may never have some of Fred’s Fruity Pebbles? (Such subtext!) The point here is how to be smart about everything, even if you sound like a stoner in mid-reverie. Sometimes you can be too smart about everything and lose some of the organization and structure you started out with. Also people get tired of hearing you. I also wonder if, a decade later, Klosterman has switched to something oatier, grainier, healthier than Lucky Charms? What do you wanna bet?

Vowell on mix tapes: Really more of a personal essay, but notice the ease with which she tells her story, and thus, gets at a more universal story of what it means (meant) to compile a mix tape. Sure, she could have given us the history of the invention of audio tape, and talked about the format’s impending doom, but maybe she knew somebody else (a lot of somebody elses) had either already done it or would come along and do it. Seems like we all felt what she wanted us to feel, even if tapes are long gone.

Then we moved to the business of the students’ pitching ideas for their essays. I won’t attach these to the names of the authors quite yet, since the deadline is still 12 days off and they have the right to change their minds, but just a few ideas I’ve heard that I really like are cowboy hats, corn dogs, the calendar and orange earplugs. That’s just the beginning. Lots of research to do and people to talk to on any or all of those. I haven’t heard one idea yet that I don’t like, but remember to narrow it down from the broad to the specific. Someone mentioned bumper stickers, to which I would (and did) say, well, in an essay of a thousand words, how about one kind of bumper sticker (e.g., the “COEXIST” sticker … or those little decals that minivan mommies put up of their stickfigure family). You see how I did that?

This assignment has two points.

1. Uninhibited, highly descriptive, incredibly fun, potentially heartbreaking, factual writing.

2. Sharpening our ability to NOTICE everything.

For our next class, Monday, Sept. 10, we’re reading four pieces in which the reporters — in these cases, all Style section people — were tasked with a topical assignment and had to turn it around quickly, often for editors who were desperate for something smart to put in tomorrow’s paper. What to look for: How the pop-cultural, essay-like style works its way into each piece, sometimes just as a paragraph or two. What did the writer have to find out to write this piece? What did the writer have to know, have to feel? What did the writer already, even instinctively, know?

• “Goodbye, Mr. Chips,” Monica Hesse doing an appreciative deadline essay about the death of the man who invented the Dorito. (Washington Post, 2011)

• “Two Months that Zap Your Zip,” Martha Sherrill outsmarting the dreaded “August” assignment, comparing it to February. (Washington Post, 1995)

• “Honoring @, which made the Web a place for us all,” Monica Hesse again, noticing that the “at” symbol had been inducted into the Internet hall of fame. (Washington Post, 2012)

• “Real Men Can’t Hold a Candle to Jake Ryan,” yours truly acting on a editor’s request for Valentine’s Day copy, by mining a cultural icon who ruined crushes forever. (Washington Post, 2004)

Until then … Come back Monday with your essay pitches really firmed up and ready for group input. Don’t forget to come talk to me if you need any guidance whatsoever. You know I love batting ideas around. If you can’t find me, text me or email me or tweet me.

hamletsOkay, everyone, settle down, and stop your goddamn clickety-clicking and distracted surfing!

I have analog media to promote (look, a book!), or, if you must, some kindling for your Kindle, an iBook to get your little greasy fingerprints all over. This is the full Tonsil blog endorsement of Hamlet’s BlackBerry: A Practical Philosophy for Building a Good Life in the Digital Age, by William Powers. It just came out. I got to read a galley a while back. You’ll soon be reading about it in all the right places.

‘Cause there’s a movement afoot, and books to go along with it (such as the slightly, faintly similar The Shallows by Nicholas Carr), and it is this: Everyone slow the fuck down. Where are we going in such a hurry? Are we sure want to go there? What will happen when we get there, besides the death of thinking, writing, keeping, knowing? Is it too late for our crazybrains? Have we already lost contemplation, rumination?

This book gets at all that. It’s a combination of essay, history, and some smart suggestions for unplugging just enough to breathe and consider. William Powers is a friend I’ve never spent time with. I know his wife, Martha Sherrill, better. They both served in the trenches of The Washington Post Style section and wrote tons of great stories, and even long after they left, came to my aid when I had to write “The List” of ins and outs. They now live this tranquil-sounding life on Cape Cod (year round) with their son. From the snowdrifts, they send lovely hand-drawn Christmas cards that cause in me a sort of longing and admiration for their happiness. (It’s okay, I love it.) Check out Martha’s ongoing blog about the local neighborhood dump. No, don’t! Focus on THIS. Stop being so skittish and webby.

Hamlet’s BlackBerry offers a window on life at the Powers-Sherrill household, where there’s an “Internet sabbath” in effect from Friday night to Monday morning. I think a lot of people are able to (or try to) manage that sort of habit — blogger culture has been especially good about upholding a weekend and holiday ethic (“blogging will be light — I’ll be making apple pies for the holiday and swimming in the river and you shouldn’t be online anyhow! See you Monday” etc), if only to project an image of holistic living, i.e., I’m too busy kayaking to blog now.

Alas, for me, too many weekends are spent in some terribly pointless web surfing, blogging, e-mailing, YouTube watching, etc.

william_powers_hamlets_blackberry_12

William Powers

One of my favorite things Bill wrote (and apparently one of David Carr’s favorites, too) was about the onslaught of “Did You See?” that infected our culture in the mid-2000s. (I like to write it as Didjusee?) It was about the beginning of the Internet all-you-can-eat buffet and the end of people actually reading or considering all the links they were clicking on or re-linking (now called retweeting). It no longer mattered. The question was only  “Didjusee what so-and-so wrote on Slate?” “Didjusee the Lindsey Lohan video on TMZ?” “Didjusee what Mitt Romney told the Times?” Didjusee? Didjusee?

Ah, but did you read it as well? Usually no.

This is a gentle book that describes what’s happening to paper and to life. It starts with Bill musing on what the Internet has done to us, and can any of it possibly be undone, or done better?

Then he even-more-gently walks us through some moments in history when thinkers and writers had to accept technological changes: Socrates had to accept that Gen Y’ers like Phaedrus liked to keep discourses and speeches on scrolls, so they could carry them around read them again and again, without all that talking. In Shakespeare’s world, people had to get used to the new annoying habit of everyone carrying scratch pads around, to take notes and jot down information. (i.e., Hamlet’s BlackBerry, which sort of sounds like one of these.) Gutenberg gave us a world where we could disappear into books and newspapers and tune out the world. (Are you even listening to me? etc.)

Finally, Hamlet’s BlackBerry seeks some ways in which we can make use of our new technologies and still have a life with one another. It’s a beginner’s guide for training oneself to survive the current renaissance — a tumult I think won’t be settled until long after we’re all dead. Forget jobs and media and making a living; I would just like to survive this revolution with my brain intact. Wouldn’t you?

So, hooray for Hamlet’s BlackBerry. I was sent two copies from the publisher and have pressed them into the duties of book promotion. However, I’ve purchased an additional two copies, one for me to keep AND ONE THAT I’M HAPPY TO GIVE TO A DESERVING SOUL. Simply e-mail me here (go to “contact” in the nav bar) before July 16, 2010 and tell me why you want it. (Like we did with Kim Severson’s book.)

PS: Bill’s on tour. If you live in Washington, go see him at Politics & Prose on July 20!

stylehydpeWhen casting about helplessly on my own articles (or just putting off the inevitable), I like to randomly, briefly cruise through The Post archives and see what was up 10, 20, 45 years ago in the paper.

Just now I came across this appreciation that Jura Koncius and Martha Sherrill wrote when Nina Hyde, the Post‘s fashion editor, died of cancer 20 years ago. I try to never post things in their entirety from the archives, but this is so old and it was never online, and I think it’s a great read.

What strikes me now is not only the way Nina Hyde worked, (New York fashion shoots? For the Washington Post?), but how she really didn’t care for things and fashion so much as personal style, and what that meant, in a world before a gazillion fashion blogs, before the celebrity/fashion nexus grew into the beast it now is. This is about a real sense of journalism. I didn’t know her. I loved learning from this that she just constantly stopped people in malls and on the street, and asked them about what they had on. That’s fashion reporting. (It lives on, a little bit.)

Appreciation: In Her Own Inimitable Fashion / (c) The Washington Post [p. F1, May 6, 1990]

By Jura Koncius and Martha Sherrill / Washington Post Staff Writers

The Style of Nina Hyde. She didn’t own high heels. She wore a Swatch Watch for years that she’d picked up at the airport. She didn’t put on much makeup, and she taught a couple of us to bite our nails. When she found a favorite outfit, she’d often wear it three times a week. She kept a pair of silver earrings — cone-shaped snail shells — in the top drawer of her desk for TV interviews. Usually they were the only jewelry she wore besides her wedding ring.

She was a city girl. She was handsome, beautiful. She spoke with an old-line voice from the Upper East Side where she was raised. Nina, who died Friday night after a long battle with cancer, had style but taught us all about substance instead.

She would always drag us out, her assistants past and present, to lunches at the O’Mei Restaurant — around the corner from The Post — to celebrate anything. And before long, we’d become each other’s friends, each other’s bridesmaids. We’d throw baby showers for each other and we would laugh hard when we told The Nina Stories.

We would mythologize. Nina, The Fashion Editor With a Social Conscience. Nina, The Queen of the Cleveland Park Yard Sales. Nina, The Impossible. Several assistants hadn’t lasted long. One, more fragile than the rest — we always reminded Nina — had a nervous breakdown after a strenuous fashion shoot in New York and was never heard from again.

The shoots provided the most material. We’d go on about models wearing fur coats in 100-degree weather. About staying up half the night with Michael Borden — Nina’s New York stylist and The Funniest Man Alive — taping the soles of new shoes so they wouldn’t scuff. About how we’d put on cocktail hats with veils and gotten stuck in clothes sometimes two sizes too small. About hitting Studio 54, or Xenon or the Palladium, with Nina. About how she’d interview people there as though she were Margaret Mead on an expedition.

ninahydeNina never was as frivolous as the subject she covered. She lived like a Yankee. She cared nothing for china or linens, silver or decorating or status cars. She cared nothing, really, for things. If you admired something, she might give it to you. She’d lend anything she owned. She had a homemade black taffeta skirt at least 15 different women have worn, and which Patsy Rogers in the Home section still has in her closet because Nina told her to keep it. And when you gave Nina a present, she’d often give it away to somebody else. There was a polished antique leather box that her former assistant Kathleen Stanley gave her one year, and that Nina confessed months later that she’d handed over to Ralph Lauren as a house gift.

She shared her gossip, her thoughts, her contacts, her bran muffins. She smuggled us into parties. She showed us her mail. She bragged about us to her friends. She wanted us to meet Bill Blass, Ralph Lauren, Calvin Klein. When Diana Vreeland called, Nina would whisper: “You want to hear her voice? Pick up your extension — go ahead, listen in.”

And she shared her courage; watching her in action made us feel stronger. She could pull out a note pad even at the most awkward moments, and ask the tough questions. We watched her try on wigs when her hair fell out, and buy a cane when it got hard to walk. She even gave fashion tips to nurses while she got chemotherapy. She stood before hundreds of people and talked about her terminal cancer. Until several months ago, she was flying around giving speeches, appearing on television. She came into work just a few weeks ago and wrote her last Fashion Notes column.

Sunday Fashion Notes. It was like a running journal of Nina’s life. Since 1976, she wrote every week. She called in columns, when she was dog-tired and depressed, from the shows in Milan and London and Paris. She called in from Beijing when there weren’t supposed to be telephones there. She called from India, from Tibet, from Africa, from Australia, from Grenada and from a spa in Baja, Mexico.

She adored her job — both as fashion editor of The Washington Post, and as a freelancer on far-flung assignments for National Geographic. “I have the greatest job in the world,” she’d always say, which might be why she was never not working. This could drive you crazy. She got to work two hours before anyone else — and turned the lights on in the Style section every morning. At restaurants and shopping malls, you’d find her cornering somebody — like a woman in a yellow suede miniskirt — for a quote. An outfit she’d seen as she was walking to lunch would become something for her Wednesday shopper column, originally called Cheap Frills and Glad Rags, then just Cheap Frills, then Capital Assets and then Try It!

She knew fashion — the business, the trends, the designers, the dirt — but she didn’t always buy it. She’d say: “It isn’t fashion until somebody wears it.” And to Nina, her job wasn’t just reporting The Important Sweater that was chic in Paris, or where you could find a Chanel knockoff bag for under $25. She believed in what she saw around her. She believed in shopping discount stores. She believed in wearing what you had in your closet. Her favorite story she’d written for the paper was called “Black Style,” which ran in 1980. “To be brought up Black and clothes-conscious in urban America is virtually redundant” was Nina’s lead.

“Nina’s People.” That’s what Ben Bradlee used to call the hordes of wannabes who lined up on Wednesday mornings for 10 minutes of Nina’s frank fashion advice. They came with batik ties, leather ponchos, denim furs. The jewelry was usually hard to look at. But for those with a sign of talent, Nina was generous with encouragement.

There were other Nina People. You came to know them. You became one. She had a universe of loyal friends. And a galaxy of people she helped along the way. She loved them, they worshiped her. Some were la-di-da Washington cave dwellers and French aristocrats. There were good ol’ boys at National Geographic and international photographers. There were no-nonsense housewives she’d met along the road — parents of her daughters’ friends. There were gay men, fashion types, and old battle-ax garmentos from Seventh Avenue. Designer Issey Miyake would call from Tokyo. The Maharani of Jaipur from India. Bill Blass from his country house with a joke he’d heard — or his meatloaf recipe. For years, Geoffrey Beene sent postcards from around the world.

She was motherly without meddling. After she found out one assistant, who was new to town, lived down the street from Bob Woodward — then unattached — she wangled an invitation to the Metro section Christmas party because it was being held at his house. She later introduced them so many times that Woodward had to say, finally: “Nina, we’ve met.”

She seemed almost shy sometimes. She never wanted to talk about herself, she wanted to know about you. And, as she had with her daughters, Nina encouraged her assistants to be independent. To travel. To see new things. To rely on ourselves, not our husbands or boyfriends.

And she stood by us. She encouraged us to move on at the newspaper — to write or edit — even when it meant losing someone she valued and having to train a new assistant. She wrote us letters of recommendation. She helped us get jobs, then threw parties for us when we got them. She gave us rides home. She would have had us to dinner every night, if she could. And she believed in us, it seemed, when nobody else did.

Her friends would flock faithfully to every Nina Event — her lecture series at the Smithsonian, her fashion symposiums at Constitution Hall, the designer lectures at The Washington Post, and the many parties honoring her, which for the last 4 1/2 years that Nina struggled with breast cancer seemed almost like a monthly affair.

And they’d even turn up at her yard sales, an annual ritual. Her assistants and friends would gather at dawn with their wares, in her Cleveland Park back yard. First we’d eat doughnuts. Then we’d begin dealing with the people who showed up — sometimes before 7 a.m. Nina’s items never sold too well. And they were not what you’d expect from some glitzy fashion editor. A broken movie projector. Ugly vases from all the flowers she’d gotten. Dusty napkins and greeting cards from a party store that she and Lloyd, her husband, owned when they first came to Washington. Nina was famous for haggling with customers. There’d be old paperbacks she was selling for 25 cents each, and when one was finally purchased for 10 cents, she’d throw it into a glossy shopping bag from, say, Jean-Paul Gaultier in Paris.

We’d do anything for her. We’d bring guest towels to her parties. Our husbands mowed her lawn. When Nina needed her suede jacket cleaned, our job became finding the best leather cleaner in Washington, and then Nina would write a Fashion Note about it.

We transcribed totally incomprehensible interviews she’d had — half in French or Italian — with The Fashion Greats. We’d hear wine glasses clinking in the background. We heard Yves Saint Laurent’s bulldog, Mougique, breathing heavily under the table. Once, we even transcribed a reading of Nina’s tarot cards, a copy of which remained in her file drawer for 10 years under the heading: Spooky Tunes.

And we’d do anything to make her laugh. We fooled her with fake phone calls — “Would you hold for Halston, please?” asked an assistant calling from the Post cafeteria. We put on outrageous clothes. And in 1986, during the weekend of “The Nina Hyde Tribute” when hundreds of big-name designers and store presidents and celebrities flew in from around the world to honor her 25 years as a fashion editor … we roasted her. We Xeroxed pictures of Nina and stuck them around the walls: a young Nina in Paris sitting reverently at the bedside of Madame Vionnet. Nina in her “penguin dress.” Nina and Karl Lagerfeld’s ponytail. Nina joking around with Calvin.

We told The Nina Stories. We called it “A Tribute to Anita Heinz.” We gave her a cake with her portrait in chocolate frosting.

On her last birthday in September — her 57th — a few friends gathered at the home of Betty Ann Ottinger, one of her closest friends. Her daughters, Jennifer and Andrea, came, her brother, Howard, her husband, Lloyd. And there were several former assistants, and the current one, Julie Bresnick. The next day, Nina sent one of us this message in the computer:

“I know this sounds nuts, but last week was one of the worst weeks in my life, and my birthday was one of the best.”

Subscribe